Book Creator as a pedagogical strategy in language and literature at the secondary level
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: 21st century education requires pedagogies that develop communication, critical thinking, and creativity. However, traditional teaching methodologies in Language and Literature persist, generating student disinterest and widening the gap between school culture and digital culture. Objective: To analyze the implementation of Book Creator as a pedagogical strategy through the creation of collaborative multimedia projects to improve motivation and meaningful learning in Language and Literature for 7th grade students. Methodology: Narrative bibliographic review of studies published between 2019-2025 in academic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Dialnet, Redalyc, SciELO), following a systematic protocol for literature search, selection, and thematic analysis. Results: The implementation demonstrated high effectiveness, with 92% success in multimedia integration, 87% in narrative coherence, and 78% in linguistic accuracy. An increase from 5.5 to 8.7 points (out of 10) in writing competencies was observed, representing a 58% improvement in academic performance. Conclusion: Book Creator establishes itself as an effective pedagogical strategy for transforming Language and Literature teaching, developing communicative-digital competencies, and promoting active and collaborative learning, although its success critically depends on teacher training and digital equity. General Area of Study: Education. Specific Area of Study: Educational technology applied to Language and Literature teaching. Type of Study: Narrative bibliographic review.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Cauja, N., Gómez, M., Quishpe, E., & Tasinchano, J. (2024). Bookcreator como herramienta digital para incentivar los proyectos. Mentor, Revista de Investigación Educativa y Deportiva, 3(8) , 364–379. https://revistamentor.ec/index.php/mentor/article/view/7905/6591
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Montenegro-Rueda, M., López-Meneses, E., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2021). Digital teaching competence in higher education: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(11), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110689
Fundació Factor Humá [FFH]. (2021). Unidad de Conocimiento – Learning by doing. Factor humano. https://factorhuma.org/attachments/article/14929/learning-by-doing-cast.pdf
García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell, A. (2020). La CoVId-19: ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior? Campus Virtuales, 9(2), 83-98. https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/144140/7.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Grenier, S., Gagné, M., & O’Neill, T. (2024). Self‐determination theory and its implications for team motivation. Applied Psychology, 73(4), 1833-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12526
Gutiérrez-Martín, A., Pinedo-González, R., & Gil-Puente, C. (2021). ICT and media competencies of teachers. Convergence towards an integrated MIL-ICT model. Comunicar, 30(70), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.3916/c70-2022-02
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Lannin, A., Van Garderen, D., Abdelnaby, H., Smith, C., Juergensen, R., Folk, W., & Romine, W. (2023). Scaffolding learning via multimodal stem text sets for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 47(2), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487231187637
Masaquiza Guamán, A. B. (2025). Book Creator como estrategia motivacional para la escritura en básica media. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(2), 6566-6577. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i2.17385
Ruiz-Mora, F., Barrionuevo-Terán, E., Villacres-Perez, M., & Estrella-Semblantes, M. (2023). El docente como mediador y diseñador de experiencias de aprendizaje. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(6-1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.6-1.2255
Sánchez Santana, V. G., & Maldonado Gavilanez, C. E. (2023). Motivación y atención en estudiantes de educación general básica. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i2.606
Sánchez-López, I., Bonilla-Del-Río, M., & Soares, I. O. (2021). Digital creativity to transform learning: empowerment from a com-educational approach. Comunicar, 29(69), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.3916/c69-2021-09
Singhal, S., Jatana, N., Suri, B., Misra, S., & Fernandez-Sanz, L. (2021). Systematic literature review on test case selection and prioritization: a tertiary study. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 12121. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112412121
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sukhera, J. (2022). Narrative reviews: flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414-417. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-22-00480.1
Villao Salinas, I. N., & Matamoros Dávalos, Á. A. (2024). La brecha digital en la educación. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(4), 1522 – 1539. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2337
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Pres. https://archive.org/details/mindinsocietydev0000vygo/mode/2up
Zambrano Sarzosa, M. A., Zambrano Zambrano, L. L., Barba Mosquera, M. M., Macias Segura, C. L., & Macias Segura, K. E. (2024). Tecnologías digitales y equidad en la educación global. Código Científico Revista de Investigación, 5(2), 1938–1955. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/ccri/v5/n2/642