Aplicación de la estrategia de andamiaje para mejorar las habilidades de la expresión oral en alumnos de décimo grado

Main Article Content

Iralda Mercedes Riera Tubón
Luis Antonio Paredes Rodríguez

Abstract

Introduction: Ecuador is one of the countries in Latin America with the lowest level of English, for this reason, many researches have been conducted to face this problem. Objectives: The present study explored the impact of applying the Scaffolding strategy for developing English as a foreign language focusing on speaking skills. Methodology: A quasi-experimental research was used. The participants were tenth-grade students of the "Unidad Educativa Belisario Quevedo" in Pujilí-Ecuador. The sampling method was non-probabilistic and intentional. The instrument was obtained from the oral expression section of the Cambridge PET exam (Preliminary English Test A2) functioning as a pre-test and post-test. Subsequently, the Scaffolding Strategy was applied to one group where students had fourteen class sessions with a structured procedure designed according to the stages of the already mentioned strategy. At the end of the study, all participants were evaluated through of a post-test to measure the effectiveness of the strategy. Results: The findings were highly satisfactory due to students’ speaking levels where the strategy was applied, significantly increased. Eventually, aspects like Grammar and Vocabulary, Pronunciation, and Interactive Communication were strengthened through the stages of the Scaffolding strategy. Conclusions: The results of this study support the use of the Scaffolding strategy in oral skills allowing students to comprehend more information and incorporate innovative ideas into their prior knowledge. The general area of study: Education. Specific area of study: English language learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Riera Tubón, I. M., & Paredes Rodríguez, L. A. (2023). Aplicación de la estrategia de andamiaje para mejorar las habilidades de la expresión oral en alumnos de décimo grado. Ciencia Digital, 7(3), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v7i3.2584
Section
Artículos

References

Adab, H. W. (2017). Exploring the practice of teacher-student classroom interaction in EFL to develop the learners’ speaking skills in Tullu Sangota primary school grade eight students in focus. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 8(4), 1-18.
Bundick, M. Q. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4).
Cambridge English Qualifications. (2020). A2 Key Handbook for teachers for exams from 2020. cambridgeenglish.org/qualifications.
Corral, Y., & Franco, A. (2015). Procedimientos de muestreo. Revista ciencias de la educación, 26(46), 151-167.
Dennen, V. P. (2013). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 804-819). Routledge
Fernandez, P., Vallejo, G., Livaci, P., & Tuero, E. (2014). Validez Estructurada para una investigación cuasi-experimental de calidad: se cumplen 50 años de la presentación en sociedad de los diseños cuasi-experimentales. Anal. Psicol, 30(2), 756-771.
Griva, E., Semoglon, K., & Geladari, A. (2020). Early foreign language learning: Implementation of a project in a game-based context. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3700-3705.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2006). Analisis de los datos cuantitativos. Metodología de la investigación, 407-499
Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study. Computer assisted language learning, 26(3), 197-213.
Khalifa, H. a. (2009). Examining Reading: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking, Studies in Language Testing. Cambridge University Press, 29.
Lamb, S. H. (2020). Educational opportunity in Australia 2020. Unsplash: Mitchell Institute.
Langdon, A., & Pandor, J. (2020). An investigation of scaffolding strategies to support structured inquiry language teaching to novice learners in a Primary School setting. Language Value, 13(1), 1-22.
Lasso, R. (2021). Aplicación de andamiaje en un modelo de aprendizaje sostenible y su influencia en el estado emocional durante la COVID-19. VI Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Cooperación (CINAIC 2021), 175-181.
Llera, J., Matinengo, N., & Galiotti, H. (2017). Aplicación de técnicas de muestreo probabilístico para estimar la calidad del mosto de uvas tintas. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 49(1), 199-126.
López, P. (2004). Población maestra y muestreo. Punto cero, 9(8), 69-74.
Moody, S. H. (2018). Vocabulary instruction: A critical analysis of theories, research, and practice. Education Sciences, 8(4), 180.
Mozelius, P. (2017). Critical factors for implementing blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 6(2), 37-51.
Okati, F., Mojavezi, A., & Pishadast, A. (2022). Enhancing Writing Ability through Scaffolding Techniques: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 12(3), 214-237.
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 277-232.
Rabolini, N. (2009). Técnicas de muestreo y determinación del tamaño de la muestra en investigación cuantitativa. Revista Argentina de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 2.
Sari, D., & Rozimela, Y. (2021). The Implementation of Scaffolding Strategies at Speaking English Course in Kampung Inggris Pare East Java. In Ninth International Conference on Language, 51-56.
Seyedeh, Z. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability through Intervening Scaffolding Strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2191-2195.
Xu, D. G. (2020). Does blended instruction enhance English language learning in developing countries? Evidence from México. British journal of educational technology, 51(1), 211-227.