Statistical Analysis of Specific Learning Results National University of Chimborazo

Main Article Content

Héctor Salomón Mullo Guaminga
Jessica Alexandra Marcatoma Tixi
Natalia Alexandra Pérez Londo
Sonia Rodas Espinoza.

Abstract

The article deals with a topic of particular importance for university educational evaluation, focused on studying the quality of the Specific Learning Outcomes test using psychometric theory. With this intention, the work followed a non-experimental quantitative approach, with a descriptive scope, using the Classical Test Theory and the Item Response Theory. The results indicate that the tests have good quality in the design, construction, application, qualification and reporting phases; however, the verification phase is of poor quality, since piloting, calibration, and reagent selection are not performed. On the other hand, within the study of the items, quality problems are evident in difficulty and discrimination, while in reliability they showed consistency and precision in the scores obtained by the exam. Furthermore, the tests, as a whole, have a low power of discrimination between the different skill levels of the supporters. Finally, the results suggest that either of the two psychometric theories can be used to study the Specific Learning Outcome tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mullo Guaminga, H. S., Marcatoma Tixi, J. A., Pérez Londo, N. A., & Rodas Espinoza. , S. (2020). Statistical Analysis of Specific Learning Results National University of Chimborazo. Explorador Digital, 4(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v4i3.1342
Section
Artículos

References

Baker, F., & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R.
Barbero, M., Vila, E., & Holgado, F. (2015). Psicometría. Madrid: Sanz y Torres.
CACES. (2019a). Evaluación de Carreras. Obtenido de https://www.caces.gob.ec/web/ceaaces/carreras
CACES. (2019b). RESOLUCIÓN No. 013-SE-06-CACES-2019. Obtenido de https://www.caces.gob.ec/documents/20143/488487/RESOLUCI%C3%93N+No.+013-SE-06-CACES-2019.pdf/469ed064-0d77-71f4-6bba-758dbdee64fc
CENEVAL. (2012). Manual Técnico enlace Media Superior 2008-2010.
Chávez, C., & Saade, A. (2009). Procedimientos básicos para el análisis de reactivos Cuaderno técnico 8. México.
Cisneros, S. (2019). Informe General De Evaluación De Resultados De Aprendizaje Específico (RAE). UNACH, Riobamba. Obtenido de http://www.unach.edu.ec/wp-content/D.E.A/3_EVALUACIO%CC%81N%20DE%20RESULTADOS%20DE%20APRENDIZAJE%20ESPECI%CC%81FICOS/3_Informe%20RAE%20Iinstitucional%2018_19.pdf
Downing, S., & Haladayna, T. (2006). Handbook of test development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linacre, M. (2003). A user’s guide to Winsteps. Chicago: Mesa Press.
Lord, F. (1977). Practical Applications of Item Characteristic Curve Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2).
Lord, F. (2012). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Routledge.
Meneses, J., Barrios, M., Bonillo, A., Cosculluela, A., Lozano, L., Turbany, J., & Valero, S. (2013). Psicometría.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (1997, p. 17). Evaluación en el aula y más allá de ella. Bogotá.
Partchev, I., Maris, G., & Hattori, T. (2017). A Collection of Functions Related to Item Response Theory (IRT).
Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2019). Test Analysis Modules.
Rodríguez, O., Casas, P., & Medina, Y. (2005). Análisis Psicométrico De Los Exámenes De Evaluacion De La Calidad De La Educación Superior (ECAES) En Colombia. Avances en Medición, 3, 153-172.
Tristan, A. (1998). Análisis de Rasch para todos. (CENEVAL, Ed.) México.