Design and analysis of gender-based violence using the random response technique

Main Article Content

Carmen Estrella Morocho Barrionuevo
Tania Paulina Morocho Barrionuevo
Diana Katherine Campoverde Santos

Abstract

Introduction. Warner (1965) was a pioneer in establishing the random response technique to reduce alterations of the estimators due to false or conditioned responses. From this contribution there were later techniques such as the unrelated response technique proposed by Greenberg (1969) and the random response technique by Liu – Chow (1976). Objective. Compare the random response techniques with the direct response technique, to estimate the true proportion of the sensitive characteristics in the study of gender violence while protecting the privacy of the respondents since by requiring direct responses this information may be altered. Methodology. The samples were established for each technique, thus having a total of 998 out of a population of 2205 students from Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, the questionnaire was composed of 15 items. Results. The random response techniques reveal an increase compared to the direct response technique, according to the estimates and confidence intervals obtained in the results. Conclution. Ultimately, thanks to the study carried out, it is found that the random response technique is more effective than the direct response technique, because it provides better estimators in all sensitive questions, since the questions are the same in both surveys. Also, it was confirmed that the respondents are more reluctant to give their answer through the direct response because perhaps the respondents think that their privacy is not well protected with this procedure. This is not the case in the Greenberg and Liu – Chow technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Morocho Barrionuevo, C. E., Morocho Barrionuevo, T. P., & Campoverde Santos, D. K. (2021). Design and analysis of gender-based violence using the random response technique . ConcienciaDigital, 4(1.2), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v4i1.2.1602
Section
Artículos

References

Abdul-Ela A., Horvitz D. and Greenberg B. (1967). A multiproportions randomized response model. (62:990–1008.).
Antonak R. and Lvneh H. (1995). Randomized response technique: a review and proposed extension to disability attitude research. (1:97–145.).
Bottalessandra, A. G. (2013). Violencia contra la mujer en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Camacho, G. (2014). La Violencia de Género contra las mujeres en el Ecuador: Análisis de los resultados de la Encuesta Nacional sobre Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las Mujeres. La Violencia de Género contra las mujeres en el Ecuador:.
Censos, I. N. (2012). Encuesta Nacional de Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las Mujeres. Obtenido de https://web.archive.org/web/20171215082657/http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Infografias/violenciagenero.pdf
Censos, I. N. (2019). Encuesta Nacional sobre Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las Mujeres -ENVIGMU.
Chaudhuri A. and Mukerjee R. (1988). Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques.
Chávez, Y., & Juárez, A. (2016). Violencia de género en Ecuador. Revista Publicando, 3(8), 104-115.
Devore J. (1977). A note on the randomized response techique. 6(1525-1529).
Fox J. and Tracy P. (1986). Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys.
Greenberg B., Lafif A., Abul-Ela A., Walt R., Daniel G., and Horvitz D. (1969). The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework. 64(326).
Hidalgo N., Aguirre C., Luna I., Suasnavas A. and Albán A. (2019). Encuesta Nacional sobre Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las mujeres (ENVIGMU), Ecuador en Cifras. Encuesta Nacional sobre Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las mujeres .
Horvitz D., Shah B., and Simmons, W. (1967). The unrelated question RR model. VA: ASA( 65-72).
Joseph, G., Javaid, S., Andres, L., Chellaraj, G., Solotaroff, J., & Rajan, S. (2017). Underreporting of gender-based violence in Kerala, India : an application of the list randomization method. Policy Research Working Paper(8044). Obtenido de http://americalatinagenera.org/newsite//images/cdr-documents/publicaciones/web_nuevas_expresiones_de_criminalidad.pdf
Kim, W. D. (2005). Some New Results on the Multinomial Randomized Response Model. (34: 4).
Liu P. and Chow L. (1976). A new discrete quantitative randomized response models for quantitative data. (71:72–73).
Mangat, S. R. (1990). An alternative randomized response procedure. 77(439-442).
Moors, J. A. (1971). Optimization of the Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model. 39.
Nacional, A. (2018). Ley Orgániza Integral para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las mujeres. Quito.
O.N.U. (20 de diciembre de 1993). Declaración sobre la eliminación de la violencia contra la mujer. Obtenido de https://www.ohchr.org/sp/professionalinterest/pages/violenceagainstwomen.aspx
Salud, O. M. (2013). Estimaciones mundiales y regionales de la violencia contra la mujer: prevalencia y efectos de la violencia conyugal y de la violencia sexual no conyugal en la salud.
Scheers N. (1992). A review of randomized response techniques. Measurement and Evaluation. (25:27–41.).
Soberanis, G. R. (2008). Muestreo de respuestas aleatorizadas en poblaciones finitas: un enfoque unificador. 42(no.5).
Umesh U. and Peterson R. (1991). A critical evaluation of the randomized response method. (20:104–138.).
Warner, S. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. 60(63-69).