Comparison of performance between platforms for IAAS Open Source: OpenStack and CloudStack
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The implementation of an IaaS platform at UNACH represents a great opportunity to improve the technological infrastructure of the institution, strengthen the capacities of students and teachers, and promote innovation and competitiveness. Objective: To compare OpenStack and CloudStack platforms through performance in a virtualised environment for the implementation of a private cloud at the National University of Chimborazo. Methodology: The establishment of the scenario included the installation of three nodes: the controlling node, the computation node and the storage node deployed on Proxmox VE. Results: The analysis of each of the dimensions of the FURPS model was carried out with a sample of 35 tests, an error rate of 0.05%, the first time the normality of the data and the corresponding contrast tests, obtaining this way for the The processing time of a difference of 5.6% The best use of OpenStack The use of RAM with 0.89%, The use of the CPU with 2.67% and Outgoing Network Traffic with a 2.07%. Conclusion: a general result was calculated through a multicriteria analysis with the NAIADE method, obtaining that the performance is similar.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Celaya, J., & Sakellariou, R. (2014, December). An adaptive policy to minimize energy and sla violations of parallel jobs on the cloud. In 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (pp. 507-508). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7027541
Clavijo, L. F. O., Ledesma, J. D. F., Nieto, S. C., & Duque, C. J. G. (2018). Computación en la nube: estudio de herramientas orientadas a la industria 4.0. Lámpsakos, (20), 68-75. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6139/613964507007/613964507007.pdf
CloudStack.apache.org. (2016). Apache CloudStack™. (T. A. Foundation, Editor). Open Source Cloud Computing™. https://cloudstack.apache.org/
Comas-Rodríguez, R., Nogueira-Rivera, D., & Medina-León, A. (2014). El control de gestión y los sistemas de información: propuesta de herramientas de apoyo. Ingeniería Industrial, 35(2), 214-228. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1815-59362014000200009&script=sci_arttext
Constanzo, M. (2014). Modelos de Calidad de Software. Obtenido de http://clases3gingsof.wikifoundry.com/page/FURPS
European Commission. (2010). The Future of Cloud Computing. The Future of Cloud Computing. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/docs/cloud-report-final.pdf
Falconí, F., & Burbano, R. (2004). Instrumentos económicos para la gestión ambiental: decisiones monocriteriales versus decisiones multicriteriales. REVIBEC-Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 11-20. https://redibec.org/ojs/index.php/revibec/article/view/341/211
Hahm, J., Lim, S. B., Li, G., Cho, H., Shin, S. C., Yeom, J., & Lee, J. (2014). Function and Performance Test of Open Source CloudStack Platform for HPC Service. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 5(2), 56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297948824_Function_and_performance_test_of_open_source_cloudstack_platform_for_HPC_service
IBM SPSS Statistics Family. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics Family .http://www.spss.com.hk/software/statistics/
Ibarra, H. M. E., & Onofre, M. A. F. (2022). CONCEPCIONES DE ESTUDIANTES SOBRE INVESTIGACIÓN-ALGUNOS AVANCES. Revista Huellas, 8(2), 65-68. https://dspace.itsjapon.edu.ec/jspui/bitstream/123456789/235/1/Mitos-y-errores-en-la-elaboracion-tesis.pdf
Ismaeel, S., Miri, A., Chourishi, D., & Dibaj, S. R. (2015, November). Open source cloud management platforms: A review. In 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (pp. 470-475). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7371524/
Jacobs, D. B. (2013). OpenStack vs. CloudStack: What's the best approach? http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/tip/OpenStack-vs-CloudStack-Whats-the-best-approach
Kim, H., Kim, H., Chun, K., & Chung, Y. (2017). Experience in Practical Implementation of Abstraction Interface for Integrated Cloud Resource Management on Multi-Clouds. KSII transactions on internet & information systems, 11(1). https://itiis.org/journals/tiis/digital-library/manuscript/file/21318/TIISVol11No1-2.pdf
Lozada, J. (2014). Investigación aplicada: Definición, propiedad intelectual e industria. CienciAmérica: Revista de divulgación científica de la Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, 3(1), 47-50. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6163749
Munda, G. (2006). A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1-2), 65-78. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJETM.2006.008253
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13-20. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/007b/c0936646c34abd369ceda930000c3d142228.pdf
OpenStack.org. (s.f.). OpenStack, 2.0. https://www.openstack.org/
Portnoy, M. (2012). Virtualization essentials (Vol. 19). John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com.ec/books?hl=es&lr=&id=0kgBf8UUsa8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=Virtualization+Essentials,+PORTNOY+Matthew,+Unique+Edition,+Serious+Skills,+Canada,+2012&ots=52fiNbwPHN&sig=318AiRNZOoGA29RQqwCoPrlWV9Q
Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH. (2004-2017). Proxmox. https://www.proxmox.com/en/
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33. https://www.nbi.dk/~petersen/Teaching/Stat2017/Power_Comparisons_of_Shapiro-Wilk_Kolmogorov-Smirn.pdf
Sabharwal, N., & Shankar, R. (2013). Apache CloudStack cloud computing. Packt Publishing. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2531530
Tamayo, F. (2006). Marco Metodológico. Obtenido de http://virtual. urbe. edu/tesispub/0088963/cap03. pdf.
Sharma, R. (2015). Learning OpenStack High Availability. Packt Publishing Ltd. https://www.perlego.com/book/4295/learning-openstack-high-availability-pdf
Tam Malaga, J. (2015). TICAL. Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación potenciando la Universidad del Siglo XXI. RedClara. https://cudi.edu.mx/sites/default/files/2022-01/TICAL2015_Las_TIC_Potenciando_la_Universidad_Del_SXXI.pdf
Yamato, Y., Nishizawa, Y., Muroi, M., & Tanaka, K. (2015). Development of resource management server for production IaaS services based on OpenStack. Journal of Information Processing, 23(1), 58-66. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ipsjjip/23/1/23_58/_article/-char/ja/
Yamato, Y. (2018). Server selection, configuration and reconfiguration technology for IaaS cloud with multiple server types. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 26, 339-360. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10922-017-9418-z
Yamato, Y., Muroi, M., Tanaka, K., & Uchimura, M. (2014). Development of template management technology for easy deployment of virtual resources on OpenStack. Journal of Cloud Computing, 3, 1-12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13677-014-0007-3
Zangara, G., Terrana, D., Corso, P. P., Ughetti, M., & Montalbano, G. (2015, November). A cloud federation architecture. In 2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC) (pp. 498-503). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7424617/