Comparison of performance between platforms for IAAS Open Source: OpenStack and CloudStack

Main Article Content

Valeria Estefanía Illapa Robles
Jhony Javier Marcatoma Morocho
Paul Xavier Paguay Soxo
René Alfonso Barragán Torres
Joffre Stalin Monar Monar

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of an IaaS platform at UNACH represents a great opportunity to improve the technological infrastructure of the institution, strengthen the capacities of students and teachers, and promote innovation and competitiveness. Objective: To compare OpenStack and CloudStack platforms through performance in a virtualised environment for the implementation of a private cloud at the National University of Chimborazo. Methodology: The establishment of the scenario included the installation of three nodes: the controlling node, the computation node and the storage node deployed on Proxmox VE. Results: The analysis of each of the dimensions of the FURPS model was carried out with a sample of 35 tests, an error rate of 0.05%, the first time the normality of the data and the corresponding contrast tests, obtaining this way for the The processing time of a difference of 5.6% The best use of OpenStack The use of RAM with 0.89%, The use of the CPU with 2.67% and Outgoing Network Traffic with a 2.07%. Conclusion: a general result was calculated through a multicriteria analysis with the NAIADE method, obtaining that the performance is similar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Illapa Robles, V. E., Marcatoma Morocho, J. J., Paguay Soxo, P. X., Barragán Torres, R. A., & Monar Monar, J. S. (2024). Comparison of performance between platforms for IAAS Open Source: OpenStack and CloudStack. Ciencia Digital, 8(1), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v8i1.2877
Section
Artículos

References

Badia, S., Carpen, A., Lébre, A., & Nussbaum, L. (2013). Enabling Large-Scale Testing of IaaS Cloud Platforms on the Grid'5000 Testbed. TTC 2013 Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Testing the Cloud, 7-12. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2489295.2489298
Celaya, J., & Sakellariou, R. (2014, December). An adaptive policy to minimize energy and sla violations of parallel jobs on the cloud. In 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (pp. 507-508). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7027541
Clavijo, L. F. O., Ledesma, J. D. F., Nieto, S. C., & Duque, C. J. G. (2018). Computación en la nube: estudio de herramientas orientadas a la industria 4.0. Lámpsakos, (20), 68-75. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6139/613964507007/613964507007.pdf
CloudStack.apache.org. (2016). Apache CloudStack™. (T. A. Foundation, Editor). Open Source Cloud Computing™. https://cloudstack.apache.org/
Comas-Rodríguez, R., Nogueira-Rivera, D., & Medina-León, A. (2014). El control de gestión y los sistemas de información: propuesta de herramientas de apoyo. Ingeniería Industrial, 35(2), 214-228. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1815-59362014000200009&script=sci_arttext
Constanzo, M. (2014). Modelos de Calidad de Software. Obtenido de http://clases3gingsof.wikifoundry.com/page/FURPS
European Commission. (2010). The Future of Cloud Computing. The Future of Cloud Computing. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/docs/cloud-report-final.pdf
Falconí, F., & Burbano, R. (2004). Instrumentos económicos para la gestión ambiental: decisiones monocriteriales versus decisiones multicriteriales. REVIBEC-Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 11-20. https://redibec.org/ojs/index.php/revibec/article/view/341/211
Hahm, J., Lim, S. B., Li, G., Cho, H., Shin, S. C., Yeom, J., & Lee, J. (2014). Function and Performance Test of Open Source CloudStack Platform for HPC Service. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 5(2), 56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297948824_Function_and_performance_test_of_open_source_cloudstack_platform_for_HPC_service
IBM SPSS Statistics Family. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics Family .http://www.spss.com.hk/software/statistics/
Ibarra, H. M. E., & Onofre, M. A. F. (2022). CONCEPCIONES DE ESTUDIANTES SOBRE INVESTIGACIÓN-ALGUNOS AVANCES. Revista Huellas, 8(2), 65-68. https://dspace.itsjapon.edu.ec/jspui/bitstream/123456789/235/1/Mitos-y-errores-en-la-elaboracion-tesis.pdf
Ismaeel, S., Miri, A., Chourishi, D., & Dibaj, S. R. (2015, November). Open source cloud management platforms: A review. In 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (pp. 470-475). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7371524/
Jacobs, D. B. (2013). OpenStack vs. CloudStack: What's the best approach? http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/tip/OpenStack-vs-CloudStack-Whats-the-best-approach
Kim, H., Kim, H., Chun, K., & Chung, Y. (2017). Experience in Practical Implementation of Abstraction Interface for Integrated Cloud Resource Management on Multi-Clouds. KSII transactions on internet & information systems, 11(1). https://itiis.org/journals/tiis/digital-library/manuscript/file/21318/TIISVol11No1-2.pdf
Lozada, J. (2014). Investigación aplicada: Definición, propiedad intelectual e industria. CienciAmérica: Revista de divulgación científica de la Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, 3(1), 47-50. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6163749
Munda, G. (2006). A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1-2), 65-78. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJETM.2006.008253
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13-20. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/007b/c0936646c34abd369ceda930000c3d142228.pdf
OpenStack.org. (s.f.). OpenStack, 2.0. https://www.openstack.org/
Portnoy, M. (2012). Virtualization essentials (Vol. 19). John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com.ec/books?hl=es&lr=&id=0kgBf8UUsa8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=Virtualization+Essentials,+PORTNOY+Matthew,+Unique+Edition,+Serious+Skills,+Canada,+2012&ots=52fiNbwPHN&sig=318AiRNZOoGA29RQqwCoPrlWV9Q
Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH. (2004-2017). Proxmox. https://www.proxmox.com/en/
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33. https://www.nbi.dk/~petersen/Teaching/Stat2017/Power_Comparisons_of_Shapiro-Wilk_Kolmogorov-Smirn.pdf
Sabharwal, N., & Shankar, R. (2013). Apache CloudStack cloud computing. Packt Publishing. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2531530
Tamayo, F. (2006). Marco Metodológico. Obtenido de http://virtual. urbe. edu/tesispub/0088963/cap03. pdf.
Sharma, R. (2015). Learning OpenStack High Availability. Packt Publishing Ltd. https://www.perlego.com/book/4295/learning-openstack-high-availability-pdf
Tam Malaga, J. (2015). TICAL. Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación potenciando la Universidad del Siglo XXI. RedClara. https://cudi.edu.mx/sites/default/files/2022-01/TICAL2015_Las_TIC_Potenciando_la_Universidad_Del_SXXI.pdf
Yamato, Y., Nishizawa, Y., Muroi, M., & Tanaka, K. (2015). Development of resource management server for production IaaS services based on OpenStack. Journal of Information Processing, 23(1), 58-66. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ipsjjip/23/1/23_58/_article/-char/ja/
Yamato, Y. (2018). Server selection, configuration and reconfiguration technology for IaaS cloud with multiple server types. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 26, 339-360. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10922-017-9418-z
Yamato, Y., Muroi, M., Tanaka, K., & Uchimura, M. (2014). Development of template management technology for easy deployment of virtual resources on OpenStack. Journal of Cloud Computing, 3, 1-12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13677-014-0007-3
Zangara, G., Terrana, D., Corso, P. P., Ughetti, M., & Montalbano, G. (2015, November). A cloud federation architecture. In 2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC) (pp. 498-503). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7424617/