Set of educational activities using PhET interactive simulation for learning fractions in adults

Main Article Content

Manuel Rodrigo Faicán Pauta
Elio Washington Yagual Morán
Janette Santos Baranda
Arian Vázquez Alvarez

Abstract

Introduction: The learning of fractions in adults requires active didactic strategies with digital technologies. In this sense, simulations are a valuable resource by providing an interactive environment. Objectives: This research aimed to design a system of activities through the integration of PHET Interactive Simulation to strengthen the learning of mathematical fractions in adults aged 40+ years in the night modality of the PCEI Rumiñahui Basic Education School. Methodology: The study adopted a mixed, applied and field approach, with a descriptive-propositional scope. He used theoretical (analytical-synthetic, inductive-deductive, modeling) and empirical (diagnostic test, student survey, teacher interview) methods. Results: Data analysis was performed using frequency distribution. The evaluation focused on four dimensions with their indicators: conceptual understanding, procedures-operability, representation, communication, attitudes, and metacognition. The initial diagnosis showed reduced global understanding in procedures, representation, communication, and low self-regulation. A system of activities with PhET was designed that includes specific objectives, orientations, work with the simulator and evaluation. Conclusions: after implementation in the teaching-learning process, the results significantly improved all the indicators evaluated, except for the simple average, which remained with the same value. In addition, high acceptance and feasibility by the students was reflected. General area of study: education. Specific area of study: Educational technology. Type of study: Original article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Faicán Pauta, M. R., Yagual Morán, E. W., Santos Baranda, J., & Vázquez Alvarez, A. (2026). Set of educational activities using PhET interactive simulation for learning fractions in adults. Ciencia Digital, 10(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v10i1.3578
Section
Artículos

References

Acquah, I. K., Gyan, M., Appiah, D., Ansah, B. O., Wilson, R., & Mensah, C. E. (2024). Improving students’ performance in resolution of vectors using PhET interactive simulations. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 5(3), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v5i3.1078

Almadrones, R. D., & Tadifa, F. G. (2024). Physics Educational Technology (PHET) simulations in teaching general physics 1. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 635–650. https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/632

Ávila Correa, B. L. (2018). Perspectivas de transformación digital de las universidades del Ecuador. Revista Ciencias Pedagógicas e Innovación, 6(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v6i2.233

Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina y el Caribe [CAF-banco]. (2024). Desigualdad 4.0: a cerrar la brecha digital [Institucional]. https://www.caf.com/es/actualidad/noticias/desigualdad-40-a-cerrar-la-brecha-digital/

Burgos-Posligua, M. O., & Samada-Grasst, Y. (2023). Sistema de actividades didácticas para el desarrollo de la preescritura en niños de 5 años. MQRInvestigar, 7(3), 766-793. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.7.3.2023.766-793

Diab, H., Daher, W., Rayan, B., Issa, N., & Rayan, A. (2024). Transforming science education in elementary schools: the power of PhET simulations in enhancing student learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105

Efgivia, M. G., Erminawati, Fitriani, E., & Herni. (2021). Analysis of Andragogy Theory and Practice. Published by Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.027

El-Amin, A. (2020). Andragogy: a theory in practice in higher education. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 54-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/JRHE.2020.2.4

García Aretio, L. (2019). Necesidad de una educación digital en un mundo digital. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23911

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., Swanson, R. A. & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The Adult Learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th edition). Imprint Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612

Kumar, D. (2024). PhET: an interactive simulation technology for learning outcomes-based teaching-learning science. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.21276/IERJ24501797296604

Landtblom, K. (2023). Opportunities to learn mean, media, and mode afforded by textbook tasks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(3), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.655

Melliofatria, Mahdum, Hadriana, & Purwanti, I. T. (2024). Models For Andragogy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evolutionary studies in imaginative culture, 583-616. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.757

Ministerio de Educación, Deporte y Cultura del Ecuador. (2025). Adaptaciones curriculares con énfasis en competencias para la educación de personas jóvenes, adultas y adultas mayores en situación de escolaridad inconcluso para Básica Superior y Bachillerato. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2025/09/adaptaciones-curriculares-EGB-BS-BG.pdf

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics (1st. edition). National Research Council Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

Note, N., De Backer, F., & Donder, L. D. (2021). A novel viewpoint on andragogy: enabling moments of community. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620921361

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO]. (2024). El derecho a la educación. https://www.unesco.org/es/right-education

Perry, R., Neumayer DePiper, J., Tsinnajinnie, B., Jackson, B. E., & Thornley, L. (2025). Numeracy education for adult learners: a scan of the field and principles for course and materials design. Adult Learning, 36(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595241245146

Salinas Villacrés, D., & Negri Cortés, M. I. (2021). ¿Por qué volver a la escuela? Un estudio de caso sobre Educación de Adultos en Ecuador. International Journal of New Education, (6). https://doi.org/10.24310/IJNE3.2.2020.10248

Sánchez-Domenech, I., & Cabeza-Rodríguez, M.-Á. (2024). Andragogía digital: necesidad de saber y papel de la experiencia en un máster universitario en línea. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(2), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.2.38799

Shahbari, J. A., & Tabach, M. (2020). Making sense of the average concept through engagement in model-eliciting activities. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(8), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1740803

Stojanovic, M. (2022). Book Review: The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development by M. S. Knowles, E. F. Holton III, R. A. Swanson, & P. A. Robinson. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(2), 216-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211045695

Terhune, K., Conwell, S., Danzo, A., Graf, A., & Kim, S.-H. (2021). Supporting educational needs of older adult learners: strategies for virtual transitioning and student engagement. Innovation in Aging, 5(Supplement 1), 385. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1496