Aplicaciones de SDN en infraestructura de redes educativas

Main Article Content

Miguel Fabricio Bone Andrade
Jaime Darío Rodríguez Vizuete
Sandra María Sosa Calero
Luis Alfonso Núñez Freire

Abstract

Introduction: Although the SDN originated in the academic world, the academic RENs have not widely implemented SDN in their production network, SDN gives us a new architectural direction that allows the network to be controlled in an intelligent and central way, it also allows to be programmed, using software applications. This helps operators manage the entire network efficiently, comprehensively and consistently, regardless of the underlying network technology. Objective: Determine the parameters to apply SDN correctly in educational network infrastructure Method: In order to answer the proposed research question, a methodological process divided into 2 stages is planned: Theoretical analysis and Analysis of the factors that influence the application of SDN in educational networks. Result: A perspective based on the services of the users of university communication networks is presented, and in turn, based on the research, factors related to SDN are proposed when implementing this type of networks. Conclusions The factors that are added to the design of telecommunications infrastructure when applied to a university network are: Automated management of the network. Management of network updates. Network policy language. Security. Energy efficiency. Network virtualization. Distributed SDN controllers. Network measures, Quality of service and quality of user experience QoE. IoT Devices, Smart University, Network Security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Bone Andrade, M. F., Rodríguez Vizuete, J. D., Sosa Calero, S. M., & Núñez Freire, L. A. (2021). Aplicaciones de SDN en infraestructura de redes educativas . Ciencia Digital, 5(1), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v5i1.1539
Section
Artículos

References

Abuteir, R. M. , Fladenmuller, A. , & Fourmaux, O. (2016). An SDN approach to adaptive video streaming in wireless home networks. In 2016 International wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 321–326)
Alshnta, A. M., Abdollah, M. F., & Al-Haiqi, A. (2018). SDN in the home: A survey of home network solutions using software defined networking. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1-40. doi:10.1080/23311916.2018.1469949
Aslan, M., & Matrawy, A., (2016) “Adaptive consistency for distributed SDN controllers,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Telecommun. Network Strategy and Planning Symp. (Networks), pp. 150–157.
AutoBAHN, (2020), recuperado de: http://geant3.archive.geant.net/service/autobahn/pages/home.aspx.
Bakhshi, T. , & Ghita, B. (2016). User-centric traffic optimization in residential software defined networks. In 2016 23rd International conference on telecommunications (ICT) (pp. 1–6)
Bozkurt, I. N. , & Benson, T. (2016). Contextual router: Advancing experience oriented networking to the home. In Proceedings of the symposium on SDN research (p. 15: 1–15:7).
CEAACES. (2014). Modelo institucional de pregrado posgrado. Quito.
Charbonneau, N., & Vokkarane, V. M., (2012) "A survey of advance reservation routing and wavelength assignment in wavelength-routed WDM networks", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1037-1064, 4th Quart.
Chergarova, V. (2020). Factors Affecting Software Defined Networking Adoption by Research and Educational Networks.
Chica, J. C. C., Imbachi, J. C., & Botero, J. F. (2020). Security in SDN: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 102595.
De la Torre, D. I., Paliza, F. Á., & Fleites, A. R. (2019). Combinación de mecanismos MPLS en una arquitectura SDN. Telemática, 18(1), 1-10.
Degermark, M., Köhler, T., Pink, S., & Schelen, O., (1995) "Advance reservations for predictive service" in Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 1-15.
Dyer, J. (2009). The Case for National Research and Education Networks (NRENs). TERENA Networking Conference (TNC)
Edvinsson, L. y Malone, M. (1998). “El capital intelectual”. Bogotá: Norma.
ESnet (2017), recuperado de: http://www.es.net/.
ESnet’s OSCARS with FloodLight, (2020) recuperado de: https://github.com/hsr/oscars-gui.
Géant, (2020)recuperado de: https://www.geant.org/.
Haleplidis, E., Pentikousis, K., Denazis, S., Salim, J. H., Meyer, D., & Koufopavlou O. (2015) "Software-defined networking (SDN): Layers and architecture terminology," 2070-1721.
Hamdan, M., Hassan, E., Abdelaziz, A., Elhigazi, A., Mohammed, B., Khan, S., ... & Marsono, M. N. (2020). A comprehensive survey of load balancing techniques in software-defined network. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 102856.
Latif, Z., Sharif, K., Li, F., Karim, M. M., Biswas, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). A comprehensive survey of interface protocols for software defined networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 156, 102563.
Li, W., Meng, W., & Kwok, L. F. (2016). A survey on OpenFlow-based Software Defined Networks: Security challenges and countermeasures. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 126-139.
McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., ... & Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69-74.
Megyesi, P., Botta, A., Aceto, G., Pescape, A., & Molnar, S. (2017) “Challenges and solution for measuring available bandwidth in software defined networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 99, no. Supplement C, pp. 48–61.
Nayyer, A., Sharma, A. K., & Awasthi, L. K. (2019). Issues in software-defined networking. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Networking (pp. 989-997). Springer, Singapore.
Román, N. (2004). “Capital intelectual: generador de éxito en las empresas”. Visión Gerencial, (2), 67-79.
Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. y Edvinsson, L. (2001). “Capital Intelectual”. Paidós. Buenos Aires
Santillán Lima, J. C., Llanga Vargas, A., & Chafla, G. (2017a). Metodología para diseño de infraestructura de telecomunicaciones para campus universitarios medianos, caso La Dolorosa-UNACH. Revista Ciencia UNEMI, 10.
Santillán-Lima, J. C. (2013). Diseño de una infraestructura de telecomunicaciones que optimice el acceso a los servicios para el creciente tráfico de datos del Campus La Dolorosa de la UNACH (Tesis de maestría). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.
Santillán-Lima, J. C., Rocha-Jacome, C., Guerrero-Morejón, K., Llanga-Vargas, A., Vásconez-Barrera, F., Molina-Granja, F., (2017b). “EL IMPACTO DE LOS SERVICIOS DE TELECOMUNICACIONES Y LAS TICS EN LAS NECESIDADES DE LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR”. IV Congreso Internacional de Ciencia Tecnología Innovación y Emprendimiento CITE 2017. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar, Guaranda.
Santillán Lima, J. C., Molina Granja, F. T., Vásconez Barrera, M. F., Luna Encalada, W. G., & Lozada Yánez, R. M. (2018). Requerimientos y diseño de infraestructura de redes para campus universitarios.
Stewart, T. (1998). “La nueva riqueza de las organizaciones: el capital intelectual”. Granica, Buenos Aires.
Thimmaraju, K., Shastry, B., Fiebig, T., Hetzelt, F., Seifert, J. P., Feldmann, A., & Schmid, S. (2018). Taking control of sdn-based cloud systems via the data plane. In Proceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research (pp. 1-15).
Xia, W., Wen, Y., Foh, C. H., Niyato, D., & Xie, H. (2015). A survey on SoftwareDefined Networking. IEEE Communication Survey & Tutorial, 17(1), 27-51.

Most read articles by the same author(s)