Simulation of the aerodynamic behavior of 3 NACA profiles using computational fluid (CFD)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The simulation of aerodynamic elements using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), in the aeronautical industry represents a fundamental pillar in the development of new technologies and optimization of existing models. The aim of this study is to evaluate the behaviour of 3 profiles commonly used and defined by the National Aeronautics Committee (NACA) through ANSYS and compare the results obtained with previously published simulations. To obtain this information, models with control volumes for each profile, using CAD models based on the NACA specifications were created. In addition, it was necessary to define the boundary conditions within the simulation of finite volumes. The study allows a better understanding of parameters such as the pressure contour, speed contour, flow lines and Mach number that are characteristic of each profile, with their advantages and disadvantages. The resulting simulations determined a better overall performance of profile 63002 (5 digits) compared to profiles 4415 and 0012 (4 digits), confirming the established in the bibliography. Furthermore, the study allowed a better learning of aerodynamics (fluid mechanics) which, as far as the authors have investigated, has been little used in the Ecuadorian academic environment.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Parakkal JU, Kadi K El, El-Sinawi A, et al. Numerical analysis of VAWT wind turbines: Joukowski vs classical NACA rotor’s blades. Energy Procedia 2019; 158: 1194–1201.
Petrilli J, Paul R, Gopalarathnam A, et al. A CFD database for airfoils and wings at post-stall angles of attack. 31st AIAA Appl Aerodyn Conf. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2916.
Gülçat Ü. Fundamentals of Modern Unsteady Aerodynamics. 2nd Editio. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Epub ahead of print 2011. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14761-6.
Jacobs E, Ward K, Pinkerton R. The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests in the variable-density wind tunnel. Natl Advis Comm Aeronaut 1933; 299–354.
Harper CW, Maki RL. A review of the stall characteristics of swept wings. 1964.
Ostowari C, Naik D. Post stall studies of untwisted varying aspect ratio blades with an NACA 4415 airfoil section-Part I. Wind Eng 1984; 176–194.
Chanetz B, Délery J, Gilliéron P, et al. Experimental Aerodynamics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35562-3.
Madhanraj VR, Shah DA. CFD Analysis of NACA 2421 Aerofoil at Several Angles of Attack. J Aeronaut Aerosp Eng 2019; 08: 2–5.
Kulshreshtha A, Gupta SK, Singhal P. FEM/CFD analysis of wings at different angle of attack. Mater Today Proc 2020; 26: 1638–1643.
Prabhakar A. CFD Analysis on MAV NACA 2412 Wing in High Lift Take-Off Configuration for Enhanced Lift Generation. J Aeronaut Aerosp Eng; 02. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9792.1000125.
He W, Pérez JM, Yu P, et al. Non-modal stability analysis of low-Re separated flow around a NACA 4415 airfoil in ground effect. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019; 92: 269–279.
Autodesk. Autodesk Simulation CFD External Flow Validation : NACA 0012 Airfoil. 2015.
Tools A. NACA 4 digit airfoil generator, http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/naca4digit (2015).
Keane AJ, Sóbester A, Scanlan JP. Small Unmanned Fixed-wing Aircraft Design. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Epub ahead of print 23 October 2017. DOI: 10.1002/9781119406303.
Carmona A. Aerodinamica y actuaciones del avion. 13th ed. Paraninfo, SA, 2015.
Martinez Ferri JE. Análisis del Comportamiento Aerodinámico de Perfiles. 2012.