Comparison of phytotherapy vs conventional treatment of bacterial otitis in dogs

Abstract

Introduction. Bacterial otitis in canines, characterized by inflammation of the ear canal and accumulation of secretions, traditionally treated with antibiotics, is being reconsidered due to the growing interest in phytotherapy. The Neem tree, renowned for its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties attributed to components like nimbidin, has shown effectiveness in veterinary studies for treating infections such as otitis. Objective. Assess the effect of conventional treatment for bacterial otitis caused by cocci compared to phytotherapy and compare the effect of phytotherapy in relation to conventional treatment. Methodology. The study on otitis in dogs divided 30 patients into two groups. Each group received a weekly treatment for a month and was evaluated for another month. Group 1 was administered gel containing ciprofloxacin, prednisolone, ketoconazole, lidocaine, and corticosteroids for 3 days, while Group 2 was treated with phytotherapy composed of water, natural oils, and corticosteroids for the same duration. Results. The study investigated treatments for canine otitis, showing that the conventional one demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing erythema, hyperkeratosis, and pain, while the phytotherapy stood out in controlling inflammation. Cytology revealed significant differences in reducing cocci between both treatments, with phytotherapy being more effective. Conclusion. The conventional treatment has proven to be more effective in reducing the external symptoms of canine otitis, whereas herbal therapy has shown potential in controlling inflammation and reducing certain microorganisms. Additionally, the critical importance of effectively controlling the biofilm in the ear for the success of otitis treatment is highlighted.