Planning, an instrument to consolidate local development in the case of region three of Ecuador.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: In the framework of these previous models and the experience acquired, Ecuador promoted, starting in 2008, the implementation of planning as a system, based on a development regime, which determined territorial management and development plans by levels of government, aimed at resolving territorial imbalances that promote development and socio-economic-environmental equity of the populations. Objective: This Article aims to examine the contribution of planning, in its dimension of consolidation to the development of Region three of Ecuador during the last decade, which allows understanding the nature of the advances and / or critical nodes in the achievement of development through who have faced this public policy in the region. Methodology: A closed, multiple-choice survey was applied to representatives among public servants, personnel working in universities, private associations; the research work presented used the bibliographic method. Results: The present investigation allows to point out some development indicators of Zone 3 of Ecuador, thus, access to water (irrigation and drinking), health and education in 42.04% constitutes an important concern for the surveyed citizens, it focuses on agriculture, tourism, services and real estate development that covers 65.19% of productive activities, and drought, lack of energy, natural disasters and unemployment are the majority risks with 55.46%. Conclusions: In order to have adequate results in the economic and social sphere, through history Ecuador has adopted different economic models that allow the elimination of differences between social classes and economic powers, in order to achieve adequate sustainable development for all sectors and economic activities in the country, that is, there are fewer inequalities.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Albala-Bertrand, J. M. (1991). John Williamson (ed.), Latin American Adjustment. How Much has Happened? (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1990), pp. xv + 445. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23(2), 470–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00014310
Appiah, M., Frowne, D. I., & Tetteh, D. (2020). Re-examining the Nexus Between Financial Development and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Emerging Economies. Applied Economics Journal, 27(2), 125–144.
Asamblea Nacional, E. (2016). LEY_ORGÁNICA_DE_ORDENAMIENTO_TERRITORIAL__USO_Y_GE_63. 31.
Banco Mundial. (1996). Informe sobre el desarrollo mundial 1996. De la planificación centralizada a la economía de mercado.
Carbajales, M., & Carbajales, M. (2019). The regulatory State. Implications for the judicial control of administrative discretion. Díkaion Revista de Fundamentación Jurídica, 28(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2019.28.1.3
Cardona Osorio, J. (1987). El concepto de salud, enfermedad y salud publica segun los diferentes modos de produccion in Administracion publica de Salud. Le concept de santé, maladie et santé publique selon les différents modes de production. El concepto de salud, enfermedad y salud publica segun los diferentes modos de produccion in Administracion publica de Salud. Le concept de santé, maladie et santé publique selon les différents modes de production, 12, 103–136.
Carrozza, T. J., & Brieva, S. S. (2020). Políticas de CTI en el agro y los procesos de instrumentación: (Re)pensando el papel de la planificación estratégica. http://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/16352
Fleury, S., & Molina, C. (2002). Modelos de protección social. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Diseño y gerencia de políticas y programas sociales., 3–6.
Lira Cossio, L. (2006). Revalorización de la planificación del desarrollo. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org//handle/11362/7316
Martínez Rangel, R., & Reyes Garmendia, E. S. (2012). El Consenso de Washington: La instauración de las políticas neoliberales en América Latina. Política y cultura, 37, 35–64.
Meier, G., & Stiglitz, J. (2001). Frontiers of Development Economics (world). https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/0-1952-1592-3
Musgrove, P. (1993). Relaciones entre la salud y el desarrollo. Boletín de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana (OSP), 114(2). https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/16364/v114n2p115.pdf?sequence=1
Ponce, W., & Pérez, J. (2017). Modelo de Desarrollo Turístico Sostenible para cantones costeros: Herramienta para actores locales de Manabí, Ecuador. Posgrado y Sociedad. Revista Electrónica del Sistema de Estudios de Posgrado, 15, 65. https://doi.org/10.22458/rpys.v15i2.1965
Rey de Marulanda, N. (2000). América Latina: Pobreza y desigualad durante 50 años de reformas económicas y sociales. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo/ Instituto Interamericano para el Desarrollo Social;, 6–7.
Saiegh, S. M., & Tommasi, M. (1998). La nueva economía política, racionalidades e instituciones. Eudeba, 10, 33.
Secretaría Técnica Planifica Ecuador. (2019). Zona de Planificación 3 – Centro – Secretaría Técnica Planifica Ecuador. https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/5799/
Selee, A. (2004). Exploring the link between decentralization and democratic governance. Decentralization and democratic governance in Latin America, 3-36.
SENPLADES. (s/f). La Planificación: UN INSTRUMENTO PARA CONSOLIDAR LA REGIONALIZACIÓN. https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/08/La-Planificaci%c3%b3n.pdf
Stiglitz, J. (1998). The Role of the Financial System in Development. Presentation at the Fourth Annual Bank Conference on Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, 29, 17.
Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2020). Urban Governance, Democratic Decentralization, and Natural Resources [Chapter]. Advanced Integrated Approaches to Environmental Economics and Policy: Emerging Research and Opportunities; IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9562-5.ch009