Preferencias acerca de la Retroalimentación Oral Correctiva en las aulas de inglés como lengua extranjera en la ESPOCH

Main Article Content

Maikel Aguilera Leyva

Abstract

Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF) is considered a key tool to improve students’ skills in EFL classrooms worldwide. Therefore, it is important to identify in which ways students prefer to be corrected, as well as how professors prefer to amend students’ errors. In this context, more accurate techniques can be implemented in the classroom to improve the teaching-learning process. This investigation aims to analyze preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF) in EFL classrooms at ESPOCH. Qualitative-quantitative methods are employed in this study, considering also descriptive, analytical, and correlational aspects of research. The results reveal that students as well professors believe that OCF is necessary and effective. Likewise, students and professors agree that OCF should be given after the student has finished his participation. Moreover, content and form errors should be corrected according to students’ and professors’ points of view. Furthermore, recast and repetition of error were chosen by pupils and lecturers as the favorite types of OFC. Consequently, it is recommended to continue using OCF as a tool to improve the teaching-learning process of English. Additionally, professors should offer OCF with a positive and respectful attitude toward students. Moreover, it is advisable to favor recast and repetition of error over other types of OCF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Aguilera Leyva, M. (2020). Preferencias acerca de la Retroalimentación Oral Correctiva en las aulas de inglés como lengua extranjera en la ESPOCH. Ciencia Digital, 4(4.1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v4i4.1.1454
Section
Artículos

References

Ananda, D. R., Febriyanti, E. R., Yamin, M., & Mu’in, F. (2017). Students’ Preferences toward Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class at English Department of Lambung Mangkurat University Academic Year 2015/2016. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.03
Askew, S. (2004). Feedback for learning. Routledge.
Cathcart, R., & Olsen, J. (1976). Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. On Tesol, 76, 41–53.
Chenoweth, N. A., Day, R. R., Chun, A. E., & Luppescu, S. (1983). Attitudes and Preferences of ESL Students to Error Correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000310
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the Effects of Form-Focussed Instruction on L2 Acquisition. AILA Review. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.04ell
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054
Fungula, B. N. (2013). Oral Corrective Feedback in the Chinese EFL Classroom. Degree Project). Karlstad: Karlstads Universitet. Retrieved on November, 6, 2015.
Garcia, P., & Gass, S. (2000). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587793
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory, Research, and Practice. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1978.tb02409.x
HORWITZ, E. K. (1988). The Beliefs about Language Learning of Beginning University Foreign Language Students. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04190.x
Krahnke, K. J., & Krashen, S. D. (1983). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586656
Lee, H. (2004). Grammar Teaching in Communicative Classrooms: Focused on Teachers’ Theories and Practice. ENGLISH TEACHING (영어교육), 59(1), 3–26.
Levine, M. (1975). A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lochtman, K. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00005-3
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263197001034
Margolis, D. P. (2007). Impacts of oral error feedback in Korean university EFL classrooms. ProQuest.
Marina Vásquez Carranza, L. (2007). Correction in the ESL classroom: What teachers do in the classroom and what they think they do. Pensamiento Actual.
Martínez, J. D. D. (2014). An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers’ oral corrective feedback. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a08
Musayeva, G. (1998). Corrective discourse in Turkish EFL classrooms. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.
Oladejo, J. A. (1993). Error Correction in ESL: Learner’s Preferences. TESL Canada Journal. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v10i2.619
Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580
Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011931
Suzuki, M. (2005). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in adult ESL classrooms. … College, Columbia University Working Papers in ….
Tatawy, M. (2002). Corrective feedback in SLA Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 2. https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v2i2.1645
Ünsal Şakiroğlu, H. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in english communication classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 172–178.
Yao, S. S. (2000). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: EFL college learners’ attitudes toward error correction. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.