Technology in active learning of mathematics in basic general education in Ecuador
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. Mathematics teaching in basic general education in Ecuador faces various challenges related to understanding symbols, abstract concepts, low student motivation, and the predominance of memorization-based methodologies. Digital tools, such as Polypad (originally developed by Mathigon and currently part of Amplify), have emerged as tools to encourage and promote observation, exploration, and active learning. Objective. To evaluate the educational impact of using Polypad in learning mathematical operations with algebraic expressions in eighth-grade students at a school in Cuenca, Ecuador. Methodology. A quasi-experimental design with a mixed approach (pre-test/intervention/post-test) was applied, which was complemented by a survey, structured observation, and interviews with teachers. Sixty-eight students from two parallel classes participated in the procedure (Parallel A = 35 students; Parallel B = 33 students). The intervention consisted of five sessions with digital tool activities (use of Polypad for teaching algebraic expressions). Results. The improvements in performance were significantly positive. An example of this is given in parallel A, which went from an average of 5.83/10 to 8.45/10, representing an increase of 2.62 points, while parallel B went from an average of 5.10/10 to 6.24/10, demonstrating an increase of 1.14 points. For both parallels, increases in the understanding of exercises with algebraic expressions were observed. In addition, students expressed high motivation and preference for these collaborative activities with technology, and teachers also pointed out advantages in the use of these digital tools. Conclusion. The use of Polypad promoted active learning, improved performance, and strengthened student comprehension. However, its integration requires teacher training, adequate infrastructure, and educational policies that facilitate its accessibility. General area of study: Education. Specific area of study: Mathematics teaching. Type of study: Original articles.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Álvarez Pérez, M., Almeida Carazo, B., & Villegas Jiménez, E. V. (2014). El proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de la matemática. Pueblo y Educación. https://es.scribd.com/document/610938156/El-proceso-de-ensenanza-aprendizaje-de-la-asignatura-Matematica
Anderson, T., & Rivera Vargas, P. . (2020). A critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective. Digital education review, (37), 208–229. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342761641_A_Critical_look_at_Educational_Technology_from_a_Distance_Education_Perspective
Basdogan, M., & Bonk, C. (2023). Navegando el aprendizaje en línea a través de “marcos tecnológicos”. Online Learning, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4030
Bozkurt, A. . (2020). Educational technology research patterns in the realm of the digital knowledge age. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.570
Candela-Muñoz, J. L., & Rodríguez-Gámez, M. (2023). Active methodologies in mathematics learning. International Journal of Education, 6(1), 45–52. https://www.neliti.com/publications/571595/active-methodologies-in-mathematics-learning
Cantos Fernández, M. A., Saltos Rivas, W. R., & Zambrano Acosta, J. M. (2025). Integración de recursos digitales en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje de las operaciones básicas matemáticas. Maestro y Sociedad, 22(1), 8–21. https://maestroysociedad.uo.edu.cu/index.php/MyS/article/view/6729
Casi, R., & Sabena, C. (2024). Mathematics in art and history museums: An informal mathematics education case for teachers’ in-service training. Education Sciences, 14(5), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050489
Delport, D. . (2021). The impact of math manipulatives as a multi-sensory teaching technique in statistics. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 6(2), 186–206. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358498967_The_Impact_of_Math_Manipulatives_as_a_Multi-Sensory_Teaching_Technique_in_Statistics
Enríquez Chasin, R. I. . (2021). La efectividad del aprendizaje activo en la práctica docente. EduSol, 21(74), 102–110. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9537986
Escueta, M., Nickow, A. J., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). Education technology: An evidence-based review. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(4), 897–996. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20191507
García Paredes, N. E., Chiliquinga García, A. I., Román Cañizares, G. N., Zurita Guachamín, E. M., & Haro Sarango, A. F. . (2023). Tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en el aprendizaje universitario en el área de matemáticas. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(1), 4342–4353. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.570
Guaypatín Pico, O. A., Mantilla Parra, C. W., Cayo Lema, L. E., & Sigcha Ante, E. M. . (2024). Avance de las TIC en la matemática: Impacto en la sociedad y la educación inicial. Revista Científica de Innovación Educativa y Sociedad Actual “ALCON”, 4(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.62305/alcon.v4i2.106
Gusho, L., Muçaj, A., Petro, M. ., & Vampa, M. (2023). The use of educational technology to improve the quality of learning and teaching: a systematic research review and new perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(15), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i15.39641
Imron, I., Pramono, S. E., Rusilowati, A., Sulhadi, S., & Samsudin, A. (2025). Analysis of the use of Polypad-based educational media on mathematics teacher competencies in Indonesia: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 53(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.53.1.1631
Jimpikit Unkuch, E. M., Cerpa Flores, J. A., Padilla Gavilanez, K. I., & Pino Jiménez, J. E. (2024). Estrategias de aprendizaje activo en matemáticas: promoviendo el pensamiento crítico y la resolución de problemas. Revista Social Fronteriza, 4(2), e42237. https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(2)237
López Altamirano, D. A., López Altamirano, D. A., Ojeda Sánchez, E. P., Tunja Castro, D. T., Paredes Maroto, M. D., Sanchez Aguaguiña, N. L., Barroso Barrera, M.G., & Gómez Morales, M. d. (2022). Metodologías activas de enseñanza: Una mirada futurista al desarrollo pedagógico docente. Polo del Conocimiento, 7(2), 1419–1430. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8354965
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2021). Informe preliminar - Rendición de cuentas 2021. Gobierno del Ecuador. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2022/03/informe_narrativo_rendicion_cuentas_2021.pdf
Mumtaz, S. . (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
Naranjo Sagñay, W. C., Contreras Sánchez, E. P., Sornoza Parrales, D., & Vera Pisco, D. G. (2024). El aprendizaje basado en problemas como estrategia didáctica para la enseñanza de límite de función. Revista Científica Sinapsis, 25(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387593408_El_aprendizaje_basado_en_problemas_como_estratega_didactica_para_la_ensenanza_de_limite_de_funcion
Oliver, M., & Tao, A. (2020). What is educational technology? Rethinking the field from a philosophical perspective of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066
Pinto, M., & Laite, C. (2020). T Digital technologies in support of students learning in Higher Education: literature review. Digital Education Review, (37), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.343-360
Rodríguez-García, V. L. G., & Reye-Meza, O. B. (2022). Development of mathematical skills at the cognitive level of basic general education students. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(4), 514–523. https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/2112
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2001). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690
Sánchez Bravo, R. E., & Rodríguez Gámez, M. (2022). Incidence of digital adaptive learning programs on academic results in mathematics. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(3), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n3.2092
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. . (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students’ motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3