Propiedades psicométricas del índice de Barthel: revisión sistemática
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Introducción: Se tomó índice de Barthel como eje central de investigación, con la intención de conocer sus aportes al cuidado de pacientes, las adaptaciones en sus propiedades psicométricas realizadas, debilidades en la medición, con la intención de clarificar la ruta teórica y metodológica para una posible adaptación y validación a la realidad del Ecuador, donde al día no existe una investigación directa sobre lo descrito. Objetivo: El objetivo que se planteó fue revisar la evidencia científica sobre las propiedades psicométricas del índice de Barthel. Metodología: Se basó en una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica basada en el procedimiento PRISMA, tomando las contribuciones más significativas, basada en 11 artículos publicados en PubMed, WOS, Scopus. Resultados: Los diferentes artículos utilizados validan al índice de Barthel como un método para evaluar la capacidad física de los pacientes que han sufrido accidentes cerebrovasculares. Conclusión: El índice de Barthel se muestra como un instrumento confiable en las investigaciones revisadas, incluyendo las adaptaciones que se han realizado, siendo importante tener en cuenta por el personal de enfermería con la intención de promover la gestión de los cuidados de acuerdo con la prestación de un servicio diligente y de calidad al paciente y su familia.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Prodinger, B., O'Connor, R. J., Stucki, G., & Tennant, A. (2017). Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 49(5), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2225
Bouwstra, H., Smit, E. B., Wattel, E. M., van der Wouden, J. C., Hertogh, C. M. P. M., Terluin, B., & Terwee, C. B. (2019). Measurement Properties of the Barthel Index in Geriatric Rehabilitation. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20(4), 420–425.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.033
Liu, F., Tsang, R. C., Zhou, J., Zhou, M., Zha, F., Long, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Relationship of Barthel Index and its Short Form with the Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke patients. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 29(9), 105033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105033
Ohura, T., Hase, K., Nakajima, Y., & Nakayama, T. (2017). Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients. BMC medical research methodology, 17(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2
Strini, V., Piazzetta, N., Gallo, A., & Schiavolin, R. (2020). Barthel Index: creation and validation of two cut-offs using the BRASS Index. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(2-S), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9226
Yi, Y., Ding, L., Wen, H., Wu, J., Makimoto, K., & Liao, X. (2020). Is Barthel Index Suitable for Assessing Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Dementia?. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00282
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Guzmán-Mendoza, E., Santos-Díaz, M. de la L., Cabañas-Benitez, G., Pérez-Calderón, D. M., Chávez-Aguilar, C., Morales-Rodríguez, M. C., & Landeros-Olvera, E. A. (2017). Evaluación de los Ensayos Clínicos Aleatorios desarrollados por enfermeras según los criterios de la Declaración CONSORT. Enfermería Global, 17(1), 478–499. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.17.1.276091
Sha, L., Xu, T., Ge, X., Shi, L., Zhang, J., & Guo, H. (2021). Predictors of death within 6 months of stroke onset: A model with Barthel index, platelet/lymphocyte ratio and serum albumin. Nursing open, 8(3), 1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.754
Kaambwa, B., Bulamu, N. B., Mpundu-Kaambwa, C., & Oppong, R. (2021). Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Barthel Index and the EQ-5D-3L When Used on Older People in a Rehabilitation Setting. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(19), 10314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910314
Yang, H., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Wei, H., Chen, Y., & Jin, J. (2021). Activities of daily living measurement after ischemic stroke: Rasch analysis of the modified Barthel Index. Medicine, 100(9), e24926. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024926
Hormozi, S., Alizadeh-Khoei, M., Sharifi, F., Taati, F., Aminalroaya, R., Fadaee, S., Angooti-Oshnari, L., & Saghebi, H. (2019). Iranian Version of Barthel Index: Validity and Reliability in Outpatients' Elderly. International journal of preventive medicine, 10, 130. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_579_18
Aminalroaya, R., Mirzadeh, F. S., Heidari, K., Alizadeh-Khoei, M., Sharifi, F., Effatpanah, M., Angooti-Oshnari, L., Fadaee, S., Saghebi, H., & Hormozi, S. (2021). The Validation Study of Both the Modified Barthel and Barthel Index, and Their Comparison Based on Rasch Analysis in the Hospitalized Acute Stroke Elderly. International journal of aging & human development, 93(3), 864–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020981775
Tago, M., Katsuki, N. E., Yaita, S., Nakatani, E., Yamashita, S., Oda, Y., & Yamashita, S. I. (2021). High inter-rater reliability of Japanese bedriddenness ranks and cognitive function scores: a hospital-based prospective observational study. BMC geriatrics, 21(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02108-x
Mima, K., Kosumi, K., Miyanari, N., Tajiri, T., Kanemitsu, K., Takematsu, T., Inoue, M., Mizumoto, T., Kubota, T., & Baba, H. (2021). Impairment of Activities of Daily Living is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence and Mortality Following Curative Resection of Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 25(10), 2628–2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04990-7
Ohura, T., Hase, K., Nakajima, Y., & Nakayama, T. (2017). Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients. BMC medical research methodology, 17(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2
Bouwstra, H., Smit, E. B., Wattel, E. M., van der Wouden, J. C., Hertogh, C. M. P. M., Terluin, B., & Terwee, C. B. (2019). Measurement Properties of the Barthel Index in Geriatric Rehabilitation. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20(4), 420–425.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.033
Strini, V., Piazzetta, N., Gallo, A., & Schiavolin, R. (2020). Barthel Index: creation and validation of two cut-offs using the BRASS Index. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(2-S), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2-S.9226
Yamaguchi, T., Yamamoto, A., Oki, Y., Sakai, H., Misu, S., Iwata, Y., Kaneko, M., Sawada, K., Oki, Y., Mitani, Y., Ono, K., & Ishikawa, A. (2021). Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barthel Index Dyspnea Among Patients with Respiratory Diseases. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 16, 1863–1871. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S313583
Liu, F., Tsang, R. C., Zhou, J., Zhou, M., Zha, F., Long, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Relationship of Barthel Index and its Short Form with the Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke patients. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 29(9), 105033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105033
Inui, T., Watanabe, Y., Kurata, Y., Suzuki, T., Matsui, K., Ishii, K., Kurozumi, T., & Kawano, H. (2021). Early postoperative Barthel index score and long-term walking ability in patients with trochanteric fractures walking independently before injury: a retrospective cohort study. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 141(8), 1283–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03548-7