Identify digital communicative cultural adaptation in higher education

Main Article Content

Ana Lourdes Moyano Tapia
Daniela Tatiana Castañeda Ortiz

Abstract

Introduction: the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) as tools that have allowed the teaching-learning process to be developed in education, providing both teachers and students with a royal path for all forms of information, communication electronic or non-electronic instantaneous, process automation and storage of a variety of data. Due to the importance of these technologies being used effectively in the classroom, the teacher plays a crucial role in their knowledge and use. However, today's teachers are ineffective in their understanding of the potential benefits of the use of ICT in student training processes, which is evident in educational quality. Objective: to promote a change in mentality, create collaborative spaces and open up new possibilities to change the character of the school towards a more digitized education. Conclusions: the educational process of students through the analysis of information and communication technologies, as an interdisciplinary research method with a multicultural approach, strengthens the teaching-learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moyano Tapia, A. L., & Castañeda Ortiz, D. T. (2023). Identify digital communicative cultural adaptation in higher education. ConcienciaDigital, 6(3), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v6i3.2624
Section
Artículos

References

Abelson, H. (2008). The creation of Open Course Ware at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164¬–174. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/37585/ocw-creation-preprint.pdf
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., Alabduljader, N., Bailey, J. R., & Lee, J. (2019). A pluralist conceptualization of scholarly impact in management education: Students as stakeholders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(1), 11–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326797903_A_Pluralist_Conceptualization_of_Scholarly_Impact_in_Management_Education_Students_as_Stakeholders
Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: Moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3464–3478. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652615015899
Brudermann, T., Aschemann, R., Füllsack, M., & Posch, A. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development 4.0: Lessons learned from the University of Graz, Austria. Sustainability, 11(8), 2347. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2347
Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitization of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 22. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
Cebrián, G. (2017). A collaborative action research project towards embedding ESD within the higher education curriculum. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(6), 857–876. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318514978_A_collaborative_action_research_project_towards_embedding_ESD_within_the_higher_education_curriculum
Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.12595
Emery, S., Davis, J. M., Sageidet, B. M., Hirst, N., Boyd, D., & Browder, J. K. (2017). Transnational dialogues for sustainability research in early childhood education: A model for building capacity for ESD in universities? In Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education (pp. 143–156). Springer, Cham. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312790105_Transnational_Dialogues_for_Sustainability_Research_in_Early_Childhood_Education_A_Model_for_Building_Capacity_for_ESD_in_Universities
Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological economics, 32(2), 217-239. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800999000920
Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Sarkis, J., & Godinho Filho, M. (2017). Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162517308363
Jirgensons, M., & Kapenieks, J. (2018). Blockchain and the future of digital learning credential assessment and management. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 145–156. https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/jtes-2018-0009
Kesim, M., & Altınpulluk, H. (2015). A theoretical analysis of MOOC types from a perspective of learning theories. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 186, 15–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346569719_A_Theoretical_Analysis_of_Moocs_Types_from_a_Perspective_of_Learning_Theories
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development (Vol. 5). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261954
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2016). Design for sustainable behaviour: Investigating design methods for influencing user behavior. Annual Review of Policy Design, 4(1), 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26887990_The_Design_with_Intent_Method_A_design_tool_for_influencing_user_behaviour
Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies. Background paper for the World Development report. https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/123481461249337484/WDR16-BP-Bridging-the-Disability-Divide-through-Digital-Technology-RAJA.pdf
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-Space and homogeneity/heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernity’s (pp. 25–44), London: Sage Publications. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/students/modules/hi31v/syllabus/week18/robertson-1995.pdf
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243778765_The_Construction_of_Shared_Knowledge_in_Collaborative_Problem_Solving
Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands, and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 68–86. doi:10.1108/14676370810842193 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14676370810842193/full/html
Spillane, J. P., Seelig, J. L., Blaushild, N. L., Cohen, D. K., & Peurach, D. J. (2019). Educational system building in a changing educational sector: Environment, organization, and the technical core. Educational Policy, 33(6), 846–881. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599188.pdf
Uday, K., Parida, A., Karim, R., Söderholm, P., & Candell, O. (2009). Development of ICT‐based maintenance support services. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235280691_Development_of_ICT-based_maintenance_support_services
Vare, P., & Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 191–198. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258157776_Learning_for_a_Change

Most read articles by the same author(s)