Indicators of urban sustainability for the city of Cuenca-Ecuador: recreational spaces and green areas

Main Article Content

Andrea Paulina Morocho Sanmartín
Juan Felipe Quesada Molina
Jaime Ramiro Quezada Ortega

Abstract

Introduction. According to (Michelsen et al., 2016, p. 17). whom have determined four dimensions of sustainability: economic, social, cultural, and environmental; the same ones that are not mutually exclusive and can reinforce one another? Methodology. Based on this, the following investigation is of an exploratory-descriptive nature, focusing on recreational spaces and green areas within the city of Cuenca, thus achieving equity in future projects between professionals and those outside the branch of what encompasses architecture, projects focused on all types of people, with the identification of the respective indicators based on methodological guides such as: Methodological Guide, Emerging and Sustainable Cities Initiative (2016)., ISO 37120 (2014)., Sustainable Development Goal 11 (2019)., making sure cities and human settlements are inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Additionally, the respective evaluation tools such as: Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology, BREEAM (2012)., Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency CASBEE (2012)., LEED v4.1 Cities and Communities (2020). For the approved indicators, a score was made based on Sufficiency, Clarity, Relevance and Coherence methods through a spreadsheet designed and, a process of expert judgment, who based on their experience and expertise contributed conclusively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Morocho Sanmartín, A. P., Quesada Molina, J. F., & Quezada Ortega, J. R. (2022). Indicators of urban sustainability for the city of Cuenca-Ecuador: recreational spaces and green areas. ConcienciaDigital, 5(1.2), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v5i1.2.2087
Section
Artículos

References

Batty, M., Axhausen, K., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2016). Guía Metodológica Iniciativa Ciudades Emergentes y Sostenibles. tercera ed, 172.
Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency. (2012). CASBEE for Cities. Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC).
Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez De Contenido Y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27-36.
ISO. (2014). ISO 37120 standard on city indicators–how they help city leaders set tangible targets, including service quality and quality of life. Iso, 112. www.iso.org
ISO 37101: Sustainable development in communities. (2016). ISO 37101: Sustainable development in communities. 1-9. https://bit.ly/341A1QU
Leed V4. 1 ciudades Y Comunidades: Planificar Y Diseñar. (2020). 1-111.
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology. (2012). BREEAM Communities. Technical Manual. http://www.breeam.org
Mascarenhas, A., Nunes, L. M., & Ramos, T. B. (2015). Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: Combining stakeholders’ participation and data reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.005
Michelsen, G., Adomßent, M., Martens, P., & Hauff, M. Von. (2016). Sustainability Science. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6
Mualam y Sotto. (2020). From progressive property to progressive cities: Can socially sustainable interpretations of property contribute toward just and inclusive city-planning? Global lessons. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114472
Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial PDOT. (2015). Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial del Cantón Cuenca. 148, 148-162.
Puig, A. (2018). 30 años de evolución desde el informe Brundtland. Ciencia y Sociedad, 19(1), 27-37.
Rafizadeh, N. (2021). Movement with an Emphasis on the Concept of Universal Design. 18(94), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.22034/BAGH.2020.230179.4539
Torres, R. y. (2018). La problemática del diseño incluyente en sociedades excluyentes. Un enfoque arquitectónico-social. Congreso Internacional de Investigación e Innovación 2018, 6477-6486.
UN-Habitat. (2019). Sustainable Development Goal 11 - Make cities and human settlements. Monitoring framework. A Guide to assist national and local governments to monitor and report on SGD goal 11+ Indicators. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11
Verma, P., & Raghubanshi, A. S. (2018). Urban sustainability indicators: Challenges and opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 93(May), 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007
Yassen, A. (2017). Inclusive Aspects of Urban Design: Sociability, Walkability and Overall Ambiance. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 05(01), 1750001. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345748117500014
Sorensen, Mark, Valerie Barzetti, Kari Keipi, y John Williams. (1998). Manejo de las áreas verdes urbanas. División de MedioAmbiente del Departamento de Desarrollo Sostenible del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo 80.
Skjong, R. & Wentworth, B. (2000). Expert Judgement and risk perception. Recuperado el 15 de Enero de 2006, de http://research.dnv.com/skj/Papers/SkjWen.pdf
de Arquer, M. (1995). Fiabilidad Humana: métodos de cuantificación, juicio de expertos. Centro Nacional de Condiciones de Trabajo. Recuperado el 3 de junio de 2006, de http://www.mtas.es/insht/ntp/ntp_401.htm

Most read articles by the same author(s)