Patrones de comportamiento peatonal en relación a la calidad del espacio público en el borde del Centro Histórico de Cuenca-Ecuador

Main Article Content

Karina Alexandra Cherrez Rodas
Myrian Alexandra Larco Benítez
Fredy Rafael Llulluna Llumiquinga

Abstract

Introduction. Public space is important in the architecture of cities; however, since the 20th century, it has lost its prominence. Also, it has presented a decrease in the performance of social activities due to the appearance of certain architectural typologies. In this sense, the study of users of public space allows us to understand their needs and diagnose future urban interventions. Cuenca was declared as Cultural Heritage Site by UNESCO. "El Barranco" which is the edge of the Historical Center of Cuenca and a major connector with the new planning area, is an elementary setting for social relations. Objective. Determine the influence of the quality of public space on pedestrians’ behavior patterns. Methodology. The research was quantitative, descriptive in nature, carrying out each study point of observations of pedestrian dynamics for two weeks and using a data collection form, surveys were applied to 240 users who frequent the stairways and 3337 forms were obtained. Results. Through the study of five strategic points of "El Barranco", it was determined that the quality of its public space is not good enough and this has provoked that the use of its stairways is mostly devoted for everyday activities rather than social ones. There is very little motivation to develop social activities. It was also found that the age group, nationality, and ethnicity influence on the behavior patterns of pedestrians. Of all the pedestrians who pass through the study points, it was determined that only 20% carry out social activities, 24% optional activities and 56% only use them as connection points to their daily activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cherrez Rodas, K. A., Larco Benítez, M. A., & Llulluna Llumiquinga, F. R. (2021). Patrones de comportamiento peatonal en relación a la calidad del espacio público en el borde del Centro Histórico de Cuenca-Ecuador . ConcienciaDigital, 4(1.1), 176-197. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v4i1.1.1553
Section
Artículos

References

Bustos-Piedra, M. Elisa; Marín-Palacios, Mateo, Daniel Orellana, and Natasha Cabrera. 2017. “Accesibilidad En El Espacio Público Para Personas Con Movilidad Reducida, Cuenca Como Caso de Estudio.” In MEMORIAS V CONGRESO REDU, ed. Mauricio Espinoza. Cuenca.
Carmona, Matthew. 2019. “Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better.” URBAN DESIGN International 24(1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.
Delgado, Manuel. 2004. “De La Ciudad Concebida a La Ciudad Practicada.” Archipiélago: Cuadernos de crítica de la cultura. (0214–2686): 7–12. https://www.academia.edu/33482488/De_la_ciudad_concebida_a_la_ciudad_practicada?auto=download (July 8, 2018).
Gamboa, Pablo. 2002. “El Sentido Urbano Del Espacio Público.” Revista Bitácora Urbano Territorial (0124–7913): 13–18. https://bit.ly/2J5mhHg.
Gehl, Jan. 2004. LA HUMANIZACIÓN DEL ESPACIO URBANO: La Vida Social Entre Los Edificios. 5th ed. Copenhague: EDITORIAL REVERTE, S.A. https://kupdf.com/queue/gehl-jan-2006-la-humanizacion-del-espacio-urbano_58e54dc6dc0d60f027da9828_pdf?queue_id=-1 (November 13, 2017).
Gehl, Jan 2014. Ciudades Para La Gente. 1a ed. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ediciones Infinito. http://cisav.mx/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/M4T3.-Gehl-Jan-Ciudades-para-la-gente-cap.-1.pdf (November 13, 2017).
Golicnik, Barbara, and Ward Ward Thompson. 2010. “Emerging Relationships between Design and Use of Urban Park Spaces.” Landscape and Urban Planning 94(0169–2046): 38–53. https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5057afa9e4b01ad7e0289aad (December 13, 2017).
Haider, Jawaid. 2007. “Inclusive Design: Planning Public Urban Spaces for Children.” Municipal Engineer 160(2): 83–88.
Hermida, M. Augusta, Natasha Cabrera-Jara, P. Osorio, and Stephanie Cabrera. 2019. “Methodology for the Assessment of Connectivity and Comfort of Urban Rivers.” Cities 95: 102376.
Karsten, Lia. 2006. “Children in the City: Reclaiming the Street 1.” Children, Youth and Environments 16(1): 151–67.
Mantey, Dorota, and Wojciech Pokojski. 2020. “New Indicators of Spatial Chaos in the Context of the Need for Retrofitting Suburbs.” Land 9(8): 1–20.
Panagopoulos, Thomas et al. 2018. “The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian and Cycling Streets on Residents’well-Being in Kalamaria, Greece.” Land 7(3).
Soni, Nikhil, and Neetishree Soni. 2016. “Benefits of Pedestrianization and Warrants to Pedestrianize an Area.” Land Use Policy 57(5): 139–50.
Terraza, Horacio, María Isabel Beltrán, and Verónica Orbea. 2014. Cuenca, Ciudad Sostenible. Quito, Ecuador. http://propone.net/cccv.ec/docs/cuenca-cuidad-sostenible.pdf (January 18, 2018).

Most read articles by the same author(s)