Methodology of citizen participation in the endogenous rural development process in the case of Cantón Limón Indanza

Main Article Content

Boris Adrián Argudo Domínguez
Yonimiller Castillo Ortega

Abstract

Introduction: Citizen participation in local planning activities can represent a great challenge for rural communities, due to factors such as territorial qualities, distances between communities, access to information and the use of technical language; however, participation is one of the most valuable instruments in strengthening democracies. Objective: To design a methodology that fosters greater openness to citizen participation in the endogenous rural development process of the Limón Indanza canton. Methodology: The study has a mixed approach, in which different instruments such as the survey, the interview and the focus group were applied to obtain information, while it ends with an intervention proposal through the participation methodology. Results: As main results it was found that citizen participation mechanisms are limited in the canton; there are contradictions between institutional and citizen perceptions regarding participation; and, citizens do not follow up on development projects proposed in the PDOT. Conclusion: A participatory methodology based on open government was proposed, through the LUDO model, with which the integration of organizations, social groups and actors of the Limón Indanza canton is sought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Argudo Domínguez, B. A., & Castillo Ortega, Y. (2021). Methodology of citizen participation in the endogenous rural development process in the case of Cantón Limón Indanza. ConcienciaDigital, 4(1.1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v4i1.1.1547
Section
Artículos

References

Alburquerque, F., & Cortés, P. (2001). Desarrollo económico local y descentralización en América Latina. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador, 449 129 (2008). https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/sites/default/files/private/asambleanacional/filesasambleanacionalnameuid-29/constitucion-republica-inc-sent-cc.pdf
Ley Orgánica de Participación Ciudadana, Pub. L. No. Registro Oficial Suplemento 175, 25 (2010).
Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodová, L. (2020). How a Participatory Budget Can Support Sustainable Rural Development—Lessons From Poland. Sustainability, 12(7), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072620
Camacaro Sierra, L., Rodríguez Silva, M., Caldera de Ugarte, N., & Cestary Colmenares, J. (2012). Visión actual del desarrollo turístico urbano de Maracaibo. Método Delphi. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XVIII(3), 430-448. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/280/28024392004.pdf
Consejo Nacional de Planificación (CNP). (2017). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2017-2021-Toda una Vida (Resolución N.o CNP-003-2017; p. 148). Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo, Senplades. https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/10/PNBV-26-OCT-FINAL_0K.compressed1.pdf
García-Montes, N., & Arnanz Monreal, L. (2019). Metodologías participativas para la planificación de la sostenibilidad ambiental local. El caso de la Agenda 21. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 43, 109-133. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.43.2019.25354
Guinjoan, E., Badia, A., & Tulla, A. F. (2016). El nuevo paradigma de desarrollo rural. Reflexión teórica y reconceptualización a partir de la «Rural Web». Boletín de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 71, 179-204. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2279
Hidalgo, M., Guerrero, F., Larrea, A. M., Larrea, F., Muñoz, J. P., Ortiz, S., Tola, B., Torres D., V. H., & Unda, M. (1999). Ciudadanías emergentes: Experiencias democráticas de desarrollo local (1era ed.). Abya-Yala.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). (2020). Proyecciones Poblacionales [Institucional - Oficial]. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/proyecciones-poblacionales/
Mubita, A., Libati, M., & Mulonda, M. (2017). The Importance and Limitations of Participation in Development Projects and Programmes. European Scientific Journal, 13(5), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n5p238
Pavel, A., & Moldovan, O. (2019). Determining Local Economic Development in the Rural Areas of Romania. Exploring the Role of Exogenous Factors. Sustainability, 11(282), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010282
Sáenz Pinzón, G. P. (2017). Bosquejo de una propuesta de presupuesto participativo para los municipios de Colombia. Administración y Desarrollo, 47(2), 110-135.
Sandoval, C., Sanhueza, A., & Williner, A. (2015). La planificación participativa para lograr un cambio estructural con igualdad (Manuales de la CEPAL ISSN 2518-3923; p. 74). CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/39055/7/S1501278_es.pdf
SENPLADES. (2012). Guía metodológica de planificación institucional (p. 48). Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo. https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/03/GUIA-DE-PLANIFICACION-INSTITUCIONAL.pdf
Steel, C. E., & Mitchell, C. J. A. (2017). Economic Transition in the Canadian North: Is Migrant-Induced, NeoEndogenous Development Playing a Role? Journal of Rural and Community Development, 12(1), 55-74.

Most read articles by the same author(s)