Communicative language teaching in reading comprehension
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. Comunicative Language teaching (CLT) is generally believed to be used to teach language for communication and interaction purposes. Therefore, it seems to be more suitable in developing speaking skill. The possibility of applying CLT in the development of other skills such as reading comprehension has not been sufficiently explored. Research Aim. The purpose of this literature review is to examine communicative language teaching and its impact on reading comprehension presenting a case for the consideration at Unidad Educativa Liceo Policial Chimborazo. Methodology. Two electronic databases were searched with a limitation of forty years to reflect the most relevant information. Lists of relevant research were also examined. A total of 32 articles were selected for review. Two themes lead the literature review: ‘Communicative language teaching’, and ‘Reading comprehension’. Key Findings. It was found that communicative language teaching gives the teacher the opportunity to design programs to explore other aspects of language like reading. Conclusions. Based on the literature reviewed and its preceding discussion, it is concluded that, even though, communicative language teaching has been criticized for focusing more on the communicative aspect of language learning, this method in Ecuador is likely to bolster most students' academic performance rates and improve the overall reading rate of the country.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The 2010s Communicative language teaching in the 21st century: The 'principled communicative approach'. Perspectives, 36(2), 33-43.
Galloway, A. (1993). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction and Sample Activities. ERIC Digest.
Hiep, P. H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT journal, 61(3), 193-201.
Holliday, A. (1997). Six lessons: Cultural continuity in communicative language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 212-238.
Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. (2003). Understanding and implementtng the CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) paradigm. RELC journal, 34(1), 5-30.
Jaffe R. & Cowell J.M. (2014) Approaches for improving literature review methods. The Journal of School Nursing 30(4), 236-239.
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. Volume 1: Directions for Language Learning and Teaching. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 860 Taylor Station Rd., Blacklick, OH 43004-0545; toll-free: 800-722-4726.
Liao, X. (2004). The need for communicative language teaching in China. ELT journal, 58(3), 270-273.
Littlewood, W., & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge university press.
Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT journal, 41(2), 136-145.
Revell, J., & Flavell, R. H. (1979). Teaching techniques for communicative English. Macmillan.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today (pp. 22-26). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 494-517.
Savignon, S. J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory into practice, 26(4), 235-242.
Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL quarterly, 25(2), 261-278.
Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271-288). Springer, Boston, MA.
Sreehari, P. (2012). Communicative Language Teaching: Possibilities and Problems. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 87-93.
Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT journal, 50(1), 9-15.
Woods, D., & Çakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39(3), 381-390.
Wu, W. (2008). Misunderstandings of Communicative Language Teaching. English language teaching, 1(1), 50-53.