Experience of applying the SOLECON system as a technological tool for teaching alternative energies in early childhood education

Main Article Content

Carmen Elena Mantilla Cabrera
Ruth Genoveva Barba Vera
Alex Fernando Guambo Galarza

Abstract

Today, it is known that early stimulation is a fundamental factor in the development of social skills in school-age children through a wide range of activities that affect their integral development and are manifested in their behavior. Being the human being a being that solves his basic needs in relation to his environment acquiring affective bonds. The present study examined the role of a complex subject-matter and the panorama to facilitate its doctrine in a sample (N = 30) of preschoolers from the Initial Education Center: "José Ernesto Vallejo", city of Riobamba – Ecuador, who was observed by a previously structured registration. From the analysis, three parameters were qualitatively rated within their cognitive competence: Initiated, in Process and Acquired, which allowed to understand better how through the use of these tools a science that can be difficult to learn to an early age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mantilla Cabrera, C. E., Barba Vera, R. G., & Guambo Galarza, A. F. (2020). Experience of applying the SOLECON system as a technological tool for teaching alternative energies in early childhood education. ConcienciaDigital, 3(3.2), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v3i3.2.1400
Section
Artículos

References

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.
Baker, M., Krechevsky, M., Ertel, K., Ryan, J., Wilson, D., & Mardell, B. (2016). Playful Participatory Research: An emerging methodology for developing a pedagogy of play. Nine Edmonton.
Berg Marklund, B., & Alklind Taylor, A. S. (2015). Teachers’ many roles in game-based learning projects. In European Conference on Games Based Learning 2015 (pp. 359-367). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Bolliger, D. U., Mills, D., White, J., & Kohyama, M. (2015). Japanese students’ perceptions of digital game use for English-language learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 384-408.
De Piaget, T. D. D. C. (2007). Desarrollo Cognitivo: Las Teorías de Piaget y de Vygotsky. Recuperado de http://www. paidopsiquiatria. cat/archivos/teorias_desarrollo_cognitivo_07-09_m1. pdf.
Fernandez, Y. D. Y. (2012). Patrón Modelo-Vista-Controlador. Telemática, 11(1), 47–57.
Khan, A., & Pearce, G. (2015). A study into the effects of a board game on flow in undergraduate business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 193-201.
Knoester, M. (2012). International Struggles for Critical Democratic Education. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. Volume 427. Peter Lang New York. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006.
Markopoulos, A. P., Fragkou, A., Kasidiaris, P. D., & Davim, J. P. (2015). Gamification in engineering education and professional training. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 43(2), 118-131.
Molin, G. (2017). The role of the teacher in game-based learning: A review and outlook. In Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 649-674). Springer, Cham.
Nørgård, R. T., Whitton, N. J., & Toft-Nielsen, C. (2016). Playful teaching between freedom and control: exploring the magic circle in higher education. https://www. srhe. ac. uk/conference2016/abstracts/0175. pdf.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21-21.
Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge University Press.
Trueba Espinosa, A., Camarena Sagredo, J., Martínez Reyes, M., & López García, M. (2012). Automatización de la codificación del patrón modelo vista controlador (MVC) en proyectos orientados a la Web. CIENCIA Ergo-Sum, 19(3), 239–250.
Whitton, N. (2018). Playful learning: tools, techniques, and tactics. Research in Learning Technology, 26.