Sustainable indicators for Cuenca city: access to public equipment- recreation

Main Article Content

Mónica Maribel Ávila Méndez
César Maldonado Noboa
Cristian Eduardo Peñafiel Ortega

Abstract

The International Development Bank, through their initiative for emerging and sustainable cities, proposes some aspects for a city to be sustainable; Cuenca, due to its characteristics, is considered an intermediate city, a model of economic, social, and cultural growth. The present work do an exploratory-descriptive investigation to determine sustainable indicators of Access to recreational public equipment suitable for Cuenca through the analysis of: Sustainable Development Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities, Methodological Guide-Emerging and sustainable Cities Initiative, Sustainable development of communities-Indicators for city services and quality of life- ISO 37120, Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency for Cities, Guide: Cities and Communities-Plan and Design, BREEAM Communities Technical Manual, from which internationally proposed indicators are extracted, which are subjected to a qualification process through the experts judgment in the area and to a content validation process where it is determined if they are applicable in the Cuenca city, finally the evaluation of one the indicators obtained randomly is carried out. All the indicators subjected to qualification and evaluation are applicable for the Cuenca city, however, with the evaluation of one of these indicators we can know the current state of the city in certain sustainable aspects. The application of sustainability indicators during the planning of all recreation projects will contribute to make the Cuenca city more sustainable every day; with an environmental, economic, and social balance will be achieved; Likewise, all professionals linked to planning, execution of works, maintenance, etc. should also be promoted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ávila Méndez, M. M., Maldonado Noboa, C., & Peñafiel Ortega, C. E. (2022). Sustainable indicators for Cuenca city: access to public equipment- recreation . ConcienciaDigital, 5(1.2), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v5i1.2.2083
Section
Artículos

References

Arquer, M. (2011). Fiabilidad humana: métodos de cuantificación, juicio de expertos. Centro nacional de condiciones de trabajo, 1–5.
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2016). Guía Metodológica del Programa de Ciudades Emergentes y Sostenibles. https://publications.iadb.org/es/guia-metodologica-programa-de-ciudades-emergentes-y-sostenibles-tercera-edicion
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology. (2012). Communities Technical Manual. http://www.breeam.org
Cortinovis, C., Geneletti, D. (2018). Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions. Land Use Policy, 70(March 2017), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017
Dizdaroglu, E. (2015). Science for Environmental Policy: Indicators for Sustainable Cities (U. o. t. W. o. E. U. Science Communication Unit, Ed.). European Union. https://doi.org/10.2779/61700
Escobar, J., Cuervo, Á. (2008). Validez De Contenido y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36.
Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Municipal de Cantón Cuenca. (2015). Plan de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial del Cantón Cuenca.
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2 SUPPL. 1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
Hyrkäs, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., Oksa, L. (2003). Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(6), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00036-1
International Organization for Standardization 37120(2014). Sustainable development of communities-Indicators for city services and quality of life. https://oxy.social/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ISO_37120_2014_en___3_.pdf
JSBC, J. S. B. C (2012). Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment: The Committee for the Development of an Environmental Performance Assessment Tools for cities. JSBC.
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. (2018). Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities- An experiment on Stockholm. Land Use Policy.
Kumar, V. (2013). 101 Design Methods. John Wiley& Sons
Naciones Unidas. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. Naciones Unidas.
Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible 11 (2015). Ciudades y comunidades sostenibles. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
Sánchez, A., Carpintero, S., & López, A. (2006). Las concesiones de infraestructuras y equipamientos públicos en España. Boletín Económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española, 2890, 37–48.
Shackleton, C. M., Blair, A., De Lacy, P., Kaoma, H., Mugwagwa, N., Dalu, M. T., & Walton, W. (2018). How important is green infrastructure in small and medium-sized towns? Lessons from South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.007
USGBC, U. S. G. B. C. (2020). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design-Ciudades y Comunidades: Planificar y Diseñar. https://www.usgbc.org/leed/v41#cities-and-communities

Most read articles by the same author(s)